| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Try sleepvoting.  Tell me more about this. Should this be placed in the feature request forum?  | | | | Thorsten |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,005 |
| |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | | Thorsten | | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 681 |
| | Posted: | | | | OT: Thank heavens for this thread... EnryWiki's avatar reminded me that I haven't watched "Fawlty Towers" for several months. I will correct this starting.... NOW. | | | Mika
I hate people who love me, and they hate me. (Bender Bending Rodriguez) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Voltaire53: Quote:
Actually it's annoying enough if there is a pre-release profile (having to compare 3 or 4 people's updates and check which is best so as not to get it overwritten... why people don't check to see if 3 others have put in the same update before they do I'm not sure  ) but it's even worse if there isn't because the system recognises all the new contributions as 'new' and people can't pre-compare them. I don't understand this either - the need for 3 or more people to contribute portions of the same title at one time - rather than waiting for one to be accepted and THEN contribute changes. It makes voting tough, too. Contribution A has the disc info and CoO and Studios, Contribution B the Cast & Crew, Contribution C the audio/video data. Do you vote for one or all (or none) of them? Why can't people either upload a fully audited profule or wait until the earlier one(s) is accepted before uploading additional data? | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: March 25, 2007 | | Posts: 677 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
Quoting TomGaines:
Quote:
I think 2 days is a good compromise between getting new contribution released fast but giving time for others to vote on it.
I think it's too short a notice, especially as there is no PM notification of new profiles to be voted. That would be great! A PM informing that a DVD we own is up for voting. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,266 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pmasl: Quote:
Quoting EnryWiki:
Quote:
Quoting TomGaines:
Quote:
I think 2 days is a good compromise between getting new contribution released fast but giving time for others to vote on it.
I think it's too short a notice, especially as there is no PM notification of new profiles to be voted.
That would be great! A PM informing that a DVD we own is up for voting. I'm with Tom on this one, it's usefulness depends on how many you own, I would certainly not want a PM each time something was submitted, so this would need to be optional. It still wouldn't help with multiple submissions of new titles though. | | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TomGaines: Quote:
Quoting EnryWiki:
Quote:
Quoting TomGaines:
Quote:
I think 2 days is a good compromise between getting new contribution released fast but giving time for others to vote on it.
I think it's too short a notice, especially as there is no PM notification of new profiles to be voted.
With my collection count I do not need PM notification, because I know, that there is something to vote on every day  You lucky man! But then, even you need to check at least every two days, if you don't want to lose a single ballot  A PM notification system (or a longer notice) would be helpful to those who don't check every day, and would do no harm to frequent checkers. | | | | -- Enry | | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Lithurge: Quote:
Quoting pmasl:
Quote:
Quoting EnryWiki:
Quote:
Quoting TomGaines:
Quote:
I think 2 days is a good compromise between getting new contribution released fast but giving time for others to vote on it.
I think it's too short a notice, especially as there is no PM notification of new profiles to be voted.
That would be great! A PM informing that a DVD we own is up for voting.
I'm with Tom on this one, it's usefulness depends on how many you own, True. Quote:
I would certainly not want a PM each time something was submitted, so this would need to be optional.
Yep, that goes without saying. Quote:
It still wouldn't help with multiple submissions of new titles though. Right. For that, maybe subsequent submissions should be blocked until the first is voted. | | | | -- Enry |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| |