| Author |
Message |
| Registered: December 19, 2007 |  Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 22, 2016 8:57 PM | | | | I want to replace these covers  for these ones  I know they're not the best of color, but I didn't expect to get this:  |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,550 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 1:51 AM | | | | You should check the notes. Was the person who voted no the one who submitted the old covers? |
|
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | | Posts: 826 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 3:47 AM | | | | Looks like something Skip would do. (Even though he's been gone for years.  ) | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,773 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 9:43 AM | | | | 1 No vote doesn't mean they will be rejected. | | | | Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002. |
|
| Registered: March 16, 2007 | | Posts: 278 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 3:59 PM | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote:
Looks like something Skip would do. (Even though he's been gone for years. ) Is that really necessary? |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2008 | | Posts: 467 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 4:05 PM | | | | While I would not vote no on these I can understand why someone would.
To me looking at it it is a trade off between scans with compression artifacts and unclear text but better colors vs a lot clear text/details but really washed out colors and faded.
I would just update the notes and point out why you think the new scans are better (Can read text and less compression artifacts) and see what happened.
And lock your local if you like better. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,346 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 4:50 PM | | | | Quoting tkinnen: Quote:
While I would not vote no on these I can understand why someone would.
To me looking at it it is a trade off between scans with compression artifacts and unclear text but better colors vs a lot clear text/details but really washed out colors and faded.
I would just update the notes and point out why you think the new scans are better (Can read text and less compression artifacts) and see what happened.
And lock your local if you like better. To be honest I am not sure how I would vote... because I agree with this. One set of scans is bad to the extreme in one aspect and the other scans is bad to the extreme in another aspect. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 5:56 PM | | | | | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 7:07 PM | | | | Quoting The Movieman: Quote:
You should check the notes. Was the person who voted no the one who submitted the old covers? I did. But no, that wasn't the case. ;-) |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 7:08 PM | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote:
1 No vote doesn't mean they will be rejected. I know. Thanks.  |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 7:10 PM | | | | Quoting tkinnen: Quote:
While I would not vote no on these I can understand why someone would.
To me looking at it it is a trade off between scans with compression artifacts and unclear text but better colors vs a lot clear text/details but really washed out colors and faded.
I would just update the notes and point out why you think the new scans are better (Can read text and less compression artifacts) and see what happened.
And lock your local if you like better. True. They aren't the best of color. Thanks for your point of view and your advice! | | | | Last edited: May 23, 2016 7:32 PM by RoWi1973 |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 7:11 PM | | | | | | | | Last edited: May 23, 2016 7:15 PM by RoWi1973 |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 23, 2016 7:17 PM | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Quoting tkinnen:
Quote:
While I would not vote no on these I can understand why someone would.
To me looking at it it is a trade off between scans with compression artifacts and unclear text but better colors vs a lot clear text/details but really washed out colors and faded.
I would just update the notes and point out why you think the new scans are better (Can read text and less compression artifacts) and see what happened.
And lock your local if you like better.
To be honest I am not sure how I would vote... because I agree with this. One set of scans is bad to the extreme in one aspect and the other scans is bad to the extreme in another aspect. I see what you mean. They're not the best of color. Thanks for the comment! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,272 |
| | Posted: May 24, 2016 4:38 AM | | | | You should download a tool like GIMP, or some other free image program. I used the Auto White Balance feature to get these:   It didn't do much good for the rear, but the front is much better IMO. | | | HDTV: 52" Toshiba Regza 52XV545U AVR: Onkyo TR-707
Speakers: Paradigm Monitor 7 v6, CC-190 & Atom Monitors Subwoofer: Definitive Technology ProSub 800
BD/DVD: Oppo BDP-93 (Region Free) HD PVR: Motorola DXC3400 500GB w/ 1TB Expander
BD/DVD/Game: 250GB PS3 Slim DVD/Game: 250GB XBox 360 Elite Special Edition (Black) Game: Wii
Remote: Logitech Harmony One w/ PS3 Adapter WHS: Acer H341 Windows Home Server | | | | Last edited: May 24, 2016 4:39 AM by DoubleDownAgain |
|
| Registered: December 19, 2007 | | Posts: 43 |
| | Posted: May 24, 2016 7:45 AM | | | | Wow, that is so much better!!!!! Thanks, I'll give it a try later on!!!  |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: May 24, 2016 6:10 PM | | | | | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|